19
Jan
2012
0

January 19, 2012

“Of course I’d known about Piaget before I met him. In fact, just about a month before I met him I had quite a violent fight with a friend about how bad Piaget was. Until I met him I focused mainly on the Piaget who speaks about what children can’t do – they can’t learn this or that because they are not yet at the right stage. At our first encounter Piaget asked me what I thought about [English mathematician and philosopher] Bertrand Russell. The conversation became a debate about an argument between Russell and [French mathematician] Jules-Henri Poincare. Somehow Piaget brought children into it, and I thought, “What does this have to do with a child?” It suddenly seemed very heroic, and not only was Piaget being the hero, but so was the child! That he brought children into a debate about philosophical guiles opened my eyes. Lots of things came together. A month before that I’d seen Piaget as the structural theorist of what children can’t do, and suddenly there was this person who wasn’t restricting but was promoting the child to a philosopher.”

Papert, S. (1985). Interview. Omni Magazine. October 1985. pp. 98-104, 160.

For years I had a terrible 53rd generation photocopy of this article. So, when I recently found a copy of the October 1985 issue of Omni Magazine for sale on eBay, I snapped it up and scanned it for academic purposes. That’s right, there was a major feature-length interview of Seymour Papert in a magazine owned by Bob Guccione!

Read the complete interview (PDF)

You may also like

Seymour Papert’s Opening of the London Knowledge Lab (2004)
“School of the Future” (1986)
Seymour Papert on Unleashing Children’s Musical Creativity
LEGO, Logo, and Design